Seguir

I don't know how many minds I am in about the presence of this thing in the lab, but I suppose I will do setup this week and test performamce for - latency, jitter, packet loss and such.

Well, there's really not much to say about .

You take it out of the box, place the dish on the roof, plug it in. It takes a few minutes to find itself, align the dish and then it just works.

You do not strictly need the app (I don't have a device that would run it) to get connected , although I suppose it might help on a site with many obstructions.

latency is, as advertised, low, RTT to space and back is ~40ms. Even when loaded up it's not that bad.

Yesterday I did some very "manual" tests of VoIP call quality with . Works 100%.

So, for the moment, it would seem like the perfect solution to remote communications. For /TIC this has been a major block for years. We have been unable to install local service in quite some number of communities, due to being unable to provide reliable backhaul.

However, I do have some concerns about it.

Concerns about

1) Yet another complex dependency about which we know very little.

Will it last?
What happens if there's a massive crash in space?
How will performance be as the number of terrestrial antennas increases?

What about the environmental, scientific and political issues of the implementation of starlink, and supporting the colony project. As often, not for me to say, but once again in this work, there is the task of facilitating the making of an informed decision.

Concerns about

2) USA centralised infrastructure.

We build community networks, for community communication.

Starlinks Downlink/Uplink ratio is huge. That is to be expected, the network is designed primarily for beaming the likes of Netflix and "social media" into hearts and souls.

Still, we can ignore that and route SIP/RTP over it, and reach community services running on our servers, albeit only by routing our data through teleports.

Concerns about

3) Resource extraction.

The internet is a colonialist tool, like roads that are built into jungles to extract precious minerals, the info superhighway does the same, while you might expect here one would say "for personal data", actually we can just focus on the simple hard-earned MXN $1100/month transferred to USD via SpaceX.

Is this any worse that paying the local WISP that pays or for their uplink?

My knowledge of economics of this is limited.

@keith I read somewhere that the bandwidth allocation was very optimistic. With the current amount of satellites the bandwidth per user will go down drastically in the future. However, if you are using it in a sparsely populated area, that shouldn't be an issue for a while.
I'm more concerned about Rhizomatica funding *that guy*, but yeah... 🤷‍♀️​

@ciaby
Yesterday I found this: (from Nov 2021):

satmagazine.com/story.php?numb

"The Bandwidth Of The StarLink Constellation...and the assessment of its potential subscriber base in the USA."

@keith That's a good estimate, and it's not that great. However, if it's only for VoIP, that should be plenty :)
Regístrate para participar en la conversación
Telecomunicaciones Indígenas Comunitarias

Servidor experimental para I+D en Intranets.