Seguir

Of all the weirdo decisions taken in the industry, I can't fathom the logic behind blocking access to from terminals.

In rural there has been a massive uptake of starlink, such that in areas where there is a lack of direct mobile coverage from , , or towers, the most likely alternative is going to be a starlink.

So why then deny access to service for those customers connected in this way? After all, VoWifi calls are charged at the same rates as those routed over the mobile RAN (even as they don't actually use any resources on it)

Usually, ( ) are blocking access to their over IP from outside the home country - in order, we presume to not have customers avoid the industry's outlandish "" charges. (there are some notable exceptions)

But in the case of Starlink, (as far as I can make out) - all the terminals in a national territory are routed via the ground station in that country. - I sort of understood this may be a requirement for operation?

So why not add starlink's IPs to a whitelist for telcels?

Of course... we could all have been doing something else since long ago; is a thing, VoWifi is just glorified VoIP, just as IMS is a glorified server.

But then there would not be so much ...

I might add that lack of IMS over IP is also lamentable, but we might give them the benefit of the doubt here and assume they have been busy with other priorities and will eventually get around to it, then we'll see if they geo-restrict access.

Regístrate para participar en la conversación
Telecomunicaciones Indígenas Comunitarias

Servidor experimental para I+D en Intranets.